If someone were to find my wallet they would be forgiven for thinking two things: firstly that I could use a little more cash and fewer credit cards. Secondly they may believe I was Colonel Sanders in a past life – my wallet is literally filled with restaurant cards and vouchers for food...and often covered in grease, despite the hoards of moist towellettes I keep in my handbag.
Whilst it is perfectly natural for a woman to be besotted by food, I live in a city where most of us don’t even walk up escalators unless they are the moving kind and therefore we cannot possibly burn off all the discounted food we eat.
If you are planning to move to London you will invariably be warned that on arrival you will be given the infamous ‘Heathrow injection.’ It is even more painful than it sounds. This term describes what happens to people who move here: as soon as you get off the plane you will almost immediately put on weight. This is true for most of us; I do spend far too many work hours pondering how it is that Elle McPherson has managed to escape this fate. In the vain hope that her skinny genes are contagious I recently moved into a flat around the corner from her. It appears I have not been able to prove my ‘slim by osmosis’ theory. As I look down at the zipper on my jeans, I note it resembles a python that has just swallowed a large marsupial. I am definitely more Colonel Sanders that Charles Darwin.
There are over 6,000 restaurants in London. People may wonder how they all survive. That is easy; as obsessed as we are with food, the one thing we will never do is cook. Many new build flats are not even being built with kitchens, just enough room for a fridge and a hot plate. This suits me perfectly as it gives me more room to store my cookbooks. I own 12 cookbooks and haven’t used one. This is somewhat fitting as these books have all been written by chefs who have TV shows rather than kitchens. Chefs in London are now of the same social standing as rock stars, apparently whipping up a hollandaise is up there with penning the lyrics to ‘Hey Jude.’
The increase in cookbooks written by cooks who don’t cook has increased the number of organic stores, which are now scattered around London. It has also fuelled our need to drop the word ‘organic’ into every sentence we utter. Not buying organic is more frowned on in London than adultery; shag your brains out, but for God’s sake make sure that carrot came off a traceable farm.
Every week I buy a vegetable that I don’t even recognise and leave it on the sideboard in the kitchen as decoration. People comment and I feel as though I have impressed them with my knowledge of exclusive, funny looking vegetables. I used to be peer pressured into smoking, now I feel pressured into buying aubergines. I have a three a week habit. Despite all this, when I am alone I secretly trawl the local fast-food joints looking for my next culinary hit. The choices are endless. Anything you could hope to find in polystyrene or plastic wrap is at your fingertips.
Since it came to light that the banks had been lending cash to anyone with a pulse (I don’t think they checked), more and more cash strapped Londoners are turning to junk food for comfort. Every major fast food chain has reported increased profits and there isn’t an organic radish in sight. So the upside to the recession is that in addition to blaming our parents, our moods and the weather, we can now blame the economy for our poor eating habits.
I am not sure whom we blame for the store ‘Iceland.’ During my first week in London I decided to show off my domestic skills and had a dinner party. I cooked a lamb roast, as winter was rapidly approaching and as an Australian I am obliged to consume at least a herd a year. My guests had a little trouble cutting through the meat on their plates but were too polite to comment. One finally asked where I bought the meat from. When I replied ‘some supermarket called ‘Iceland’ all five off them dropped their cutlery, one so violently that they cracked their plate. I did not know that Iceland was called Iceland because everything was frozen (could have guessed) and that Kerry Katona was chosen as the spokeswoman because she was the MOST respectable of their customer base. The rest can't afford her crack habit. The store survives because that lamb roast cost me £3…. it also cost me a dinner plate and several knives. So I gave up cooking, no need to cook when there are so many other culinary options for Londoners – Pot Noodle has just launched a kebab flavour noodle. The only downside is that I can't claim to have burned off any calories walking to the kebab shop anymore.
Caesar once said that his army was unstoppable because his men were always well fed. If we Londoners are full of something as unnaturally sounding as ‘popcorn chicken’ what will our fate be? I will ask the banker begging on my street corner what he thinks.
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
Culture clubbed
I cried last week for the first time in months. I wasn’t crying for the two million unemployed people in the UK, or crying because Foxtons has opened one of their multicoloured real estate showrooms right around the corner from me. (A tip for Foxtons: I won’t pay 100k extra just because you offer me a latte.) I cried because my Sky TV box wouldn’t work.
At the risk of making myself sound even more pathetic you should know that I didn’t cry because I injured myself trying to repair the box, or because I was frustrated at my inability to repair it. I cried because I felt lost. I didn’t know what I was going to do with myself for the rest of that evening. It was raining outside so I couldn’t go for a walk. Not that I should have to, if Sky was working there probably would have been a great show on about walking.
When you ask most people why they moved to London their answer will invariably involve one of three things; work, love or a chance to live in one of the cultural hubs of our time. London’s status obviously coming into question this week as Dixie Fried Chicken opened up their 50th store here. Another sure sign that London is losing its status is that visitlondon.com listed this shrine to lard as a ‘restaurant/brassiere,’ as opposed to the place you go when you are so drunk that even the local kebab shop won’t serve you.
I came to London for all three of these things, well four if you count the Dixie Chicken experience. Let’s just say that I have since discovered that the first two can’t satisfy me (the jury is still out on whether the Fried chicken can nourish my soul), so I am relying on culture to enrich my life. Yet I realised this week that my idea of culture is an overpriced pay TV subscription, I didn’t even take out the optional ‘culture’ package. How is it possible that anyone who lives in London can end up so void of culture?
A contributing factor to my shallowness (apart from just being thick) maybe that like all Londoners I often simply find it hard to make my way around the city to go culture hunting. We spend so much time travelling underground --that eventually life at street level becomes a little disorienting. This is the reason that you see people scrambling for the tube stairs so quickly; there is something comforting about signage that tells you where to go, where to stand and even how you should hold your handbag. Life above ground has become far too complicated.
The tube has also messed with our sense of direction, and ability to gauge distances. Most tube stops are only hundreds of yards apart, but the tube map was designed by someone who wanted passengers to be convinced that they were travelling great distances to justify the extortionate ticket prices. As we fear getting lost (or fit) if we walk further than 100 yards, we will gravitate towards anything close to the tube station. How else can Primark at Marble Arch or Leister Square be explained? So no matter how amazing the Imperial War museum may be, unless they move it half a mile I ain’t going.
You also have to look very hard to find actually find culture in London. London is a bit like one of those holiday brochures that mislead you by getting you all excited looking at photos that are thirty years old. When you get there things aren’t quite as the photos led you to believe.
Postcards of London feature all the wonderful traditional things that one might expect to find - Beefeaters, Palaces, scones and pots of tea. All these things do exist and are wonderful, but you have to look at little bit harder to find them. They are hidden behind chain stores. Chain stores are an architectural cancer that is ravaging the city of London.
Every High Street in London looks exactly the same as the next; the only thing that varies is the number of muggings. The exception to all this is the truly magical Primrose Hill. Primrose Hill is notably the only town in the UK to successfully oppose the opening of a Starbucks. Not surprising when you know who the locals are: Robbie Williams, Sadie Frost, Kate Moss and Jude Law. I am not sure though why these people, of all people, would say no to an espresso.
I read this week that Starbucks was planning to expand further around London. There are currently eight Starbucks within a ten-minute walk of my flat. So I can only imagine that they have planning permission to build stores in people’s lounge rooms. Maybe they thought it necessary, as so many of us are left house bound by our Sky subscriptions.
Just when I think I am being a bit harsh on us Londoners I recall the woman I saw the other night at the pub. A well-dressed middle-aged woman was snuggling up to the fire with a book. She had a smile on her face, the kind of smile which only comes when two characters finally get together after hundreds of pages of agonising unrequited love, or when you have solved a murder that would have had Miss Marple dialling 118 118. Then I realise that this woman is reading a copy of ‘Tesco Spring/Summer Catalogue.’ I now no longer question the study released recently, which claims an immigrant’s grasp of English actually decreases after spending time in London.
After my incident with my Sky Box I took out a weekly subscription to London Time Out magazine. If ever I was stuck for something to do again I would be able to refer to this social bible. Maybe I would even make an effort to turn my Sky off more often. My first copy arrived this morning after what seemed like an eternity. I tore it open with the enthusiasm of a four year old at Christmas one who had eaten its body weight in sweets. I flicked through the glossy pages and then I sat down on my sofa and not surprisingly read the TV guide first.
At the risk of making myself sound even more pathetic you should know that I didn’t cry because I injured myself trying to repair the box, or because I was frustrated at my inability to repair it. I cried because I felt lost. I didn’t know what I was going to do with myself for the rest of that evening. It was raining outside so I couldn’t go for a walk. Not that I should have to, if Sky was working there probably would have been a great show on about walking.
When you ask most people why they moved to London their answer will invariably involve one of three things; work, love or a chance to live in one of the cultural hubs of our time. London’s status obviously coming into question this week as Dixie Fried Chicken opened up their 50th store here. Another sure sign that London is losing its status is that visitlondon.com listed this shrine to lard as a ‘restaurant/brassiere,’ as opposed to the place you go when you are so drunk that even the local kebab shop won’t serve you.
I came to London for all three of these things, well four if you count the Dixie Chicken experience. Let’s just say that I have since discovered that the first two can’t satisfy me (the jury is still out on whether the Fried chicken can nourish my soul), so I am relying on culture to enrich my life. Yet I realised this week that my idea of culture is an overpriced pay TV subscription, I didn’t even take out the optional ‘culture’ package. How is it possible that anyone who lives in London can end up so void of culture?
A contributing factor to my shallowness (apart from just being thick) maybe that like all Londoners I often simply find it hard to make my way around the city to go culture hunting. We spend so much time travelling underground --that eventually life at street level becomes a little disorienting. This is the reason that you see people scrambling for the tube stairs so quickly; there is something comforting about signage that tells you where to go, where to stand and even how you should hold your handbag. Life above ground has become far too complicated.
The tube has also messed with our sense of direction, and ability to gauge distances. Most tube stops are only hundreds of yards apart, but the tube map was designed by someone who wanted passengers to be convinced that they were travelling great distances to justify the extortionate ticket prices. As we fear getting lost (or fit) if we walk further than 100 yards, we will gravitate towards anything close to the tube station. How else can Primark at Marble Arch or Leister Square be explained? So no matter how amazing the Imperial War museum may be, unless they move it half a mile I ain’t going.
You also have to look very hard to find actually find culture in London. London is a bit like one of those holiday brochures that mislead you by getting you all excited looking at photos that are thirty years old. When you get there things aren’t quite as the photos led you to believe.
Postcards of London feature all the wonderful traditional things that one might expect to find - Beefeaters, Palaces, scones and pots of tea. All these things do exist and are wonderful, but you have to look at little bit harder to find them. They are hidden behind chain stores. Chain stores are an architectural cancer that is ravaging the city of London.
Every High Street in London looks exactly the same as the next; the only thing that varies is the number of muggings. The exception to all this is the truly magical Primrose Hill. Primrose Hill is notably the only town in the UK to successfully oppose the opening of a Starbucks. Not surprising when you know who the locals are: Robbie Williams, Sadie Frost, Kate Moss and Jude Law. I am not sure though why these people, of all people, would say no to an espresso.
I read this week that Starbucks was planning to expand further around London. There are currently eight Starbucks within a ten-minute walk of my flat. So I can only imagine that they have planning permission to build stores in people’s lounge rooms. Maybe they thought it necessary, as so many of us are left house bound by our Sky subscriptions.
Just when I think I am being a bit harsh on us Londoners I recall the woman I saw the other night at the pub. A well-dressed middle-aged woman was snuggling up to the fire with a book. She had a smile on her face, the kind of smile which only comes when two characters finally get together after hundreds of pages of agonising unrequited love, or when you have solved a murder that would have had Miss Marple dialling 118 118. Then I realise that this woman is reading a copy of ‘Tesco Spring/Summer Catalogue.’ I now no longer question the study released recently, which claims an immigrant’s grasp of English actually decreases after spending time in London.
After my incident with my Sky Box I took out a weekly subscription to London Time Out magazine. If ever I was stuck for something to do again I would be able to refer to this social bible. Maybe I would even make an effort to turn my Sky off more often. My first copy arrived this morning after what seemed like an eternity. I tore it open with the enthusiasm of a four year old at Christmas one who had eaten its body weight in sweets. I flicked through the glossy pages and then I sat down on my sofa and not surprisingly read the TV guide first.
Labels:
chain stores,
Dixie Chicken,
Foxtons,
London,
Miss Marple,
pay TV,
Primrose Hill,
Sky,
Starbucks,
Time Out,
visitlondon.com
Monday, 22 June 2009
Peek a boo hoo
‘All the world’s a stage,’ if we are to believe Shakespeare, who admittedly does come across as a pretty knowledgeable sort of a chap. Much to my surprise it seems that Londoners do not agree with his stage direction, or for that matter his belief that people should extend their communications skills beyond grunting. Grunting, as we know, is something that bus drivers can only aspire to.
The city in which celebrities choose to give birth on TV, have their wedding vows printed in magazines and give press interviews on their deathbed apparently has a limit. That limit has come surprisingly in the form of Google’s new Street View service, which has turned the city of London into a stage.
Londoners this week were outraged that Google had jeopardised their privacy by launching a service whereby people at home could observe every street in the capital whilst the locals performed mundane tasks. Channel 4 on the other hand were outraged that Google had managed to turn the entire city into an over crowded version of the Big Brother house, just with better haircuts.
The only mistake that Google really made was not telling Londoners that they were going to be apart of the world’s biggest reality TV show. Had the people of London thought that this was all some kind of audition the only complaint would have been that they had not been featured for long enough, or not at all. Their attempts to make sure that they had their 15 minutes of fame would have given Google and us armchair spectators some far more interesting footage. Which would be a breath of fresh air to workers in the office blocks where Facebook is banned.
If I knew that Google was auditioning Londoners I would walk, rather than run to my garbage bin every morning in my pyjamas in an attempt to impress any talent scouts watching at home. Given I wear pink pyjamas covered in piglets it is unlikely that I would be picked up for any TV work, other than maybe a cameo in The Muppets.
Google could have spiced things up further by promoting the fact that Simon Cowell and his X Factor judges would be trawling the images for his next star/puppet. If they are interested in doing this they should do it before Danni Minogue’s Botox induced facial paralysis spreads to her eyes. The latest photo on her official website would indicate that this is imminent.
Revenue from a public phone vote covering categories such as the worst dressed homeless person, the best vomit and teenage girl most likely to give birth in nine months would have ensured that the service paid for itself. It would also pay for the fleet of security vehicles Google will need to take more of these images in future. Google’s press office (run by Americans I would guess) didn’t think it was an issue to reveal to the knife wielding population of London, that Google had a number of spy cars with cameras on the streets taking these shots. My money is on the next version of Street View only covering a select number of the less dangerous areas, that or Google investing in some really long lenses.
There will be some people who are genuinely worried about their privacy, who would be relived to see the Street View service discontinued. I have in mind the middle-aged couple which I overheard panicking recently on a BA flight coming into Heathrow Terminal 5. The landing video announced that passengers would be filmed on arrival at the new terminal. The woman was in quite a state at the thought of being filmed like a common criminal, until her husband put down the copy of the Daily Mail he was studiously reading and reassured her that only foreigners would be filmed. I wondered at the time what they had to hide (and whether in fact they were the two people on the planet best suited to each other.) I guess we all have something we want to hide, such as the flowers in a vase on my dining room table which look suspiciously like the ones in my neighbour’s flower box. It’s times like this I could really embrace Google’s policy to blur the faces of people caught on camera. Alas the piglet pyjamas would be a give away.
As it stands the things I am most distressed about are: realising that my mother will know I am lying when I say I am keeping my front garden tidy. Also on Street View there appears to be a good looking guy walking past my place and had I been given prior warning of this phenomena I would have placed a bear trap outside my front door.
I do find it interesting though that Google has managed to launch this service in other countries without journalists or would be Daily Mail readers self combusting. Hell, they even launched it in Australia without much fuss. I can only assume this is because Australians were just relived that someone other than Baz Luhrmann had decided to bring an interpretation of Australia to the world.
Most curious of all is why anyone who has spent time on the streets of London would want to use this service in the first place. A friend of mine recently gave me directions to her flat. They went something like this: ‘Come out of the tube, walk past the Cock pub, you’ll run into an army of charity collectors, go past McDonalds, keep going as far as KFC, and then we are the flat above the betting shop.’ If all the world really is a stage then just maybe this is one play that should never be adapted into the movie.
The city in which celebrities choose to give birth on TV, have their wedding vows printed in magazines and give press interviews on their deathbed apparently has a limit. That limit has come surprisingly in the form of Google’s new Street View service, which has turned the city of London into a stage.
Londoners this week were outraged that Google had jeopardised their privacy by launching a service whereby people at home could observe every street in the capital whilst the locals performed mundane tasks. Channel 4 on the other hand were outraged that Google had managed to turn the entire city into an over crowded version of the Big Brother house, just with better haircuts.
The only mistake that Google really made was not telling Londoners that they were going to be apart of the world’s biggest reality TV show. Had the people of London thought that this was all some kind of audition the only complaint would have been that they had not been featured for long enough, or not at all. Their attempts to make sure that they had their 15 minutes of fame would have given Google and us armchair spectators some far more interesting footage. Which would be a breath of fresh air to workers in the office blocks where Facebook is banned.
If I knew that Google was auditioning Londoners I would walk, rather than run to my garbage bin every morning in my pyjamas in an attempt to impress any talent scouts watching at home. Given I wear pink pyjamas covered in piglets it is unlikely that I would be picked up for any TV work, other than maybe a cameo in The Muppets.
Google could have spiced things up further by promoting the fact that Simon Cowell and his X Factor judges would be trawling the images for his next star/puppet. If they are interested in doing this they should do it before Danni Minogue’s Botox induced facial paralysis spreads to her eyes. The latest photo on her official website would indicate that this is imminent.
Revenue from a public phone vote covering categories such as the worst dressed homeless person, the best vomit and teenage girl most likely to give birth in nine months would have ensured that the service paid for itself. It would also pay for the fleet of security vehicles Google will need to take more of these images in future. Google’s press office (run by Americans I would guess) didn’t think it was an issue to reveal to the knife wielding population of London, that Google had a number of spy cars with cameras on the streets taking these shots. My money is on the next version of Street View only covering a select number of the less dangerous areas, that or Google investing in some really long lenses.
There will be some people who are genuinely worried about their privacy, who would be relived to see the Street View service discontinued. I have in mind the middle-aged couple which I overheard panicking recently on a BA flight coming into Heathrow Terminal 5. The landing video announced that passengers would be filmed on arrival at the new terminal. The woman was in quite a state at the thought of being filmed like a common criminal, until her husband put down the copy of the Daily Mail he was studiously reading and reassured her that only foreigners would be filmed. I wondered at the time what they had to hide (and whether in fact they were the two people on the planet best suited to each other.) I guess we all have something we want to hide, such as the flowers in a vase on my dining room table which look suspiciously like the ones in my neighbour’s flower box. It’s times like this I could really embrace Google’s policy to blur the faces of people caught on camera. Alas the piglet pyjamas would be a give away.
As it stands the things I am most distressed about are: realising that my mother will know I am lying when I say I am keeping my front garden tidy. Also on Street View there appears to be a good looking guy walking past my place and had I been given prior warning of this phenomena I would have placed a bear trap outside my front door.
I do find it interesting though that Google has managed to launch this service in other countries without journalists or would be Daily Mail readers self combusting. Hell, they even launched it in Australia without much fuss. I can only assume this is because Australians were just relived that someone other than Baz Luhrmann had decided to bring an interpretation of Australia to the world.
Most curious of all is why anyone who has spent time on the streets of London would want to use this service in the first place. A friend of mine recently gave me directions to her flat. They went something like this: ‘Come out of the tube, walk past the Cock pub, you’ll run into an army of charity collectors, go past McDonalds, keep going as far as KFC, and then we are the flat above the betting shop.’ If all the world really is a stage then just maybe this is one play that should never be adapted into the movie.
Sunday, 19 April 2009
Unpopular kid at school
The museums of London are just like those kids in the playground who no one wanted to play with. These little fellas were so desperate to attract play mates they would have done just about anything to make themselves popular. If you ever wondered what happened to these sad things you can tune in and watch them on Big Brother.
I make this comparison to museums after my recent visit to the V&A. I should say upfront that the V&A is my favourite of all the London museums. Admittedly for an entirely unscholarly reason: the homemade beef pies in the cafĂ©. The fact that they have resorted to baking us treats should tell you that they are a tad on the desperate side for friends. Baking is the adult version of doing someone else’s homework. I must also admit I wasn’t opposed to it then and I am certainly not opposed to it now.
It isn’t just the pies, which gives away the museum's desperation.
The museums are in an unusually tricky situation, most of the great unwashed British general public go to the museums because they are free. I don’t judge as we have already established I go for the baked goods.
In the face of economic downturn back in the 1980’s the British government managed to democratise culture, art and history. It was as if Marie Antoinette’s ghost was their financial advisor; ‘Let them eat cake Prime Minister.’ Or in this case pies. Let the Londoners go to galleries and they will forget that they can’t afford bread and milk. If the working classes survived their impoverished childhoods they grew up with a very well informed opinion on whether modern day architecture is influenced most by the Greeks or by the Romans. This is incredibly useful if you get stuck for something to say to the person next to you in the benefits queue outside the Post Office on a Monday morning.
So after years of telling people that museums are free, or in other words, ‘I’ll pay you to be my friend and hang out with me’, it is then very difficult to be taken seriously. This is despite housing some of the most magnificent wonders in the world, such as my beloved pie and various other priceless artefacts.
The first sign that the V&A is desperate for friends is the decision to have a donation box at the front entrance. Their first mistake is using the word ‘voluntary.’ Not just because most people walk straight past it without putting their hands in their pockets but because most people born of the X (Factor) generation cannot pronounce such a big word, let alone know what it means.
I watch as everyone walks past the sad little empty box, everyone except for the people who seem least likely to be able to afford to make a donation: an elderly man and woman who has a bible hanging out of her handbag (circa 1973.) Maybe they didn’t read the sign outside, took one look at the architecture and thought they were walking into a church. I watch the same couple put £1 into the box for a museum map. I hope by this stage that they have realised that they are not in a church and that they are not buying a map to heaven, but rather to the men’s room.
The security bag search is also somewhat on the pathetic side. I walked in with a relatively large bag, not only because I am a woman and my gender mandates it, but because I am also carrying a laptop and more shopping than I expected to lug around London on a Saturday afternoon. Behaviour also mandated by my gender. I sling my bag on the table in front of the security guard begging to be searched. I take some pleasure in disappointing security workers by not carrying corrosives. The security guard takes one look at the bag, then at me and says, ‘No, it’s OK.’ I again was left with the impression that he didn’t want to stretch my friendship with the museum too far. OK, his leniency may have been influenced by me looking like a walking Gap ad rather than a threat to national security.
Once inside, like most visitors, I headed straight for the museum gift shop. Why look at a Venetian fresco when you can look at a Venetian fresco reproduced on a tea towel?
The shop itself takes up a significant part of the ground floor. I can just see the architect saying to the Director of the museum, ‘Now if you want the punters to come, you will have to give them a reason to hang around. I suggest we downsize the Chinese Pottery section in favour of a wall to house overpriced pretentious postcards.’ Never mind the centuries of priceless artefacts, the pencil sharpener in the shape of a pyramid will be a bigger hit and make us more popular with the cool kids.
Perhaps the most obvious sign that the museums are desperate for friends is the instruction printed on my map (the one I didn’t pay £1 for): ‘Please keep mobile phone use to a minimum.’ Only to a minimum? If there is one place on the planet where you should live in fear of phone confiscation it is a museum. Especially a museum that looks a little bit like a church. But at the V&A they don’t want to rock the boat, so you and your phone can roam freely and piss off as many people as you want, just as long as you hang out there a little bit longer. I long to experiment whether you can also talk with your mouthful and run with scissors in here.
Admittedly my beloved V&A doesn't come across as desperate as the Science Museum: on a Friday night they serve cocktails. I can only assume that this came out of a brainstorm where the thing most commonly associated with science for most people was being drunk in the back row of the science lab, after testing, and re testing the beaker labelled ‘100% alcohol.’
As I head to leave this particular Saturday I smile sympathetically at the two women standing in a booth near the exit. They are selling memberships to the V&A. How silly do they think I am? Actually maybe the last laugh is on me: my pie was £6.99. Maybe like all the geeky kids at school they will end up millionaires.
I make this comparison to museums after my recent visit to the V&A. I should say upfront that the V&A is my favourite of all the London museums. Admittedly for an entirely unscholarly reason: the homemade beef pies in the cafĂ©. The fact that they have resorted to baking us treats should tell you that they are a tad on the desperate side for friends. Baking is the adult version of doing someone else’s homework. I must also admit I wasn’t opposed to it then and I am certainly not opposed to it now.
It isn’t just the pies, which gives away the museum's desperation.
The museums are in an unusually tricky situation, most of the great unwashed British general public go to the museums because they are free. I don’t judge as we have already established I go for the baked goods.
In the face of economic downturn back in the 1980’s the British government managed to democratise culture, art and history. It was as if Marie Antoinette’s ghost was their financial advisor; ‘Let them eat cake Prime Minister.’ Or in this case pies. Let the Londoners go to galleries and they will forget that they can’t afford bread and milk. If the working classes survived their impoverished childhoods they grew up with a very well informed opinion on whether modern day architecture is influenced most by the Greeks or by the Romans. This is incredibly useful if you get stuck for something to say to the person next to you in the benefits queue outside the Post Office on a Monday morning.
So after years of telling people that museums are free, or in other words, ‘I’ll pay you to be my friend and hang out with me’, it is then very difficult to be taken seriously. This is despite housing some of the most magnificent wonders in the world, such as my beloved pie and various other priceless artefacts.
The first sign that the V&A is desperate for friends is the decision to have a donation box at the front entrance. Their first mistake is using the word ‘voluntary.’ Not just because most people walk straight past it without putting their hands in their pockets but because most people born of the X (Factor) generation cannot pronounce such a big word, let alone know what it means.
I watch as everyone walks past the sad little empty box, everyone except for the people who seem least likely to be able to afford to make a donation: an elderly man and woman who has a bible hanging out of her handbag (circa 1973.) Maybe they didn’t read the sign outside, took one look at the architecture and thought they were walking into a church. I watch the same couple put £1 into the box for a museum map. I hope by this stage that they have realised that they are not in a church and that they are not buying a map to heaven, but rather to the men’s room.
The security bag search is also somewhat on the pathetic side. I walked in with a relatively large bag, not only because I am a woman and my gender mandates it, but because I am also carrying a laptop and more shopping than I expected to lug around London on a Saturday afternoon. Behaviour also mandated by my gender. I sling my bag on the table in front of the security guard begging to be searched. I take some pleasure in disappointing security workers by not carrying corrosives. The security guard takes one look at the bag, then at me and says, ‘No, it’s OK.’ I again was left with the impression that he didn’t want to stretch my friendship with the museum too far. OK, his leniency may have been influenced by me looking like a walking Gap ad rather than a threat to national security.
Once inside, like most visitors, I headed straight for the museum gift shop. Why look at a Venetian fresco when you can look at a Venetian fresco reproduced on a tea towel?
The shop itself takes up a significant part of the ground floor. I can just see the architect saying to the Director of the museum, ‘Now if you want the punters to come, you will have to give them a reason to hang around. I suggest we downsize the Chinese Pottery section in favour of a wall to house overpriced pretentious postcards.’ Never mind the centuries of priceless artefacts, the pencil sharpener in the shape of a pyramid will be a bigger hit and make us more popular with the cool kids.
Perhaps the most obvious sign that the museums are desperate for friends is the instruction printed on my map (the one I didn’t pay £1 for): ‘Please keep mobile phone use to a minimum.’ Only to a minimum? If there is one place on the planet where you should live in fear of phone confiscation it is a museum. Especially a museum that looks a little bit like a church. But at the V&A they don’t want to rock the boat, so you and your phone can roam freely and piss off as many people as you want, just as long as you hang out there a little bit longer. I long to experiment whether you can also talk with your mouthful and run with scissors in here.
Admittedly my beloved V&A doesn't come across as desperate as the Science Museum: on a Friday night they serve cocktails. I can only assume that this came out of a brainstorm where the thing most commonly associated with science for most people was being drunk in the back row of the science lab, after testing, and re testing the beaker labelled ‘100% alcohol.’
As I head to leave this particular Saturday I smile sympathetically at the two women standing in a booth near the exit. They are selling memberships to the V&A. How silly do they think I am? Actually maybe the last laugh is on me: my pie was £6.99. Maybe like all the geeky kids at school they will end up millionaires.
Sunday, 15 March 2009
Just like in the movies
The sight of two grown men scampering up to a rooftop for some sunshine epitomised the reason why the rest of the planet felt sorry for the residents of London. Well that and fact that they seemed to be impressed by whatever it is that Peter Andre does. It also made 'Notting Hill' a damn amusing film and in turn one of the biggest hits of the 1990’s. ‘How sad.’ I thought at the time to have to sit on a rooftop to get a suntan. Cut to 14 years later and that same judgemental woman is cozying up along side the duck pond in Hyde Park, complete with hat, gloves and scarf, trying to catch some much needed sunshine on her pale face. The Japanese tourists sitting next to me burst into fits of giggles when I tried to subtly slip off the bench and test whether the ground was too waterlogged to sit on. I sprung up with such haste that they checked under the bench to see if a duck had bitten my bottom.
Until I moved to London I hadn’t given much thought to the true meaning of the phrase ‘catch sunshine.’ To catch something means that you in effect trap it in an attempt to hang onto it for a period of time. So I use the expression to explain my behaviour today very deliberately. Today I am among thousands of Londoners who have flocked to the park having made our first sun sitting in months. It is no longer a mystery to me why the ancient Druids worshipped the sun: it appears so infrequently here it does take on mystical qualities.
We modern day sun worshippers have carried around our faith for the last few months waiting for a sign. When it comes we behave very much like super sized kitchen plant: leaning to one side to catch the sun’s rays. In winter we lean towards Gregg’s the baker. Their pasties are not a reliable source of vitamin D but they do provide a certain amount of solace from not only the lack of sun, but from Sky’s decision to run ‘The Vicar of Dibley’ yet again.
In the search for sunshine we will lean towards to park, towards the Thames or towards any open space that can accommodate us. It suddenly becomes possible to get a seat in the pubs, but not so easy to get to them, as all the regulars have moved outside and are invariably standing in front of the door.
We hibernate like bears through the winter. We venture out only to perform the most essential of tasks. Anything trivial such as socialising and exercise grinds to a halt until the summer months. Eating however doesn’t grind to a halt, in fact in most cases it increases significantly. The increased food consumption helps us store fat which gives us a little something extra to live on when it gets so dark and cold that you can’t even be bothered to go out and buy food. If you have eaten enough Gregg’s and bar snacks you can delay that overwhelming cold trip to the supermarket as long as your personal supply of blubber lasts.
As I sit here I notice a phenomenon even rarer than the sun itself. The people walking past me have their lips parted and the corners of their mouths are upturned on either side. They appear to be doing something that Londoners rarely do: they are smiling. Some of them are doing it as though they are little uncomfortable with the new placement of their lips. Some look like they may be doing it for the first times in their lives and some look they are practising, but aren’t quite competent enough to go pro yet with it.
A visitor to London in winter could be forgiven for thinking that years of evolution had rid the locals of their teeth. You can go months without seeing a set. The sun changes this. When I left home this morning my next-door neighbour was sitting on her garbage bin reading the Saturday papers in the sun. She looked happier than she had in months, so I didn’t have the heart to tell her that I was awoken last night by a couple of young guys relieving themselves against that the same garbage bin.
The Japanese couple next to me are discussing how friendly they think the locals are. If only they knew what the locals were like the rest of the time. Maybe it didn’t matter, maybe it was just wonderful that this couple will go back to Japan and speak of the friendly English folk in sunny London town. I know how warming it is when people go out of their way to be friendly to you in a new country.
As I am questioning whether I may have been wrong about the humanity in London the couple stand up with their camera in hand. They approach a passing man to take a photograph of them with the gaggle of the ducks that they have been feeding a prawn sandwich from PrĂȘt. The man they approach for help doesn’t so much as stop. He continues walking and shakes his head at them. Under is breath he mutters, ‘fucking tourists.’ Ah, thank god, I was worried that too much ‘Vicar of Dibley’ had thawed the hearts of Londoners. We need a little bit of hatred here; it makes the traffic flow faster.
Until I moved to London I hadn’t given much thought to the true meaning of the phrase ‘catch sunshine.’ To catch something means that you in effect trap it in an attempt to hang onto it for a period of time. So I use the expression to explain my behaviour today very deliberately. Today I am among thousands of Londoners who have flocked to the park having made our first sun sitting in months. It is no longer a mystery to me why the ancient Druids worshipped the sun: it appears so infrequently here it does take on mystical qualities.
We modern day sun worshippers have carried around our faith for the last few months waiting for a sign. When it comes we behave very much like super sized kitchen plant: leaning to one side to catch the sun’s rays. In winter we lean towards Gregg’s the baker. Their pasties are not a reliable source of vitamin D but they do provide a certain amount of solace from not only the lack of sun, but from Sky’s decision to run ‘The Vicar of Dibley’ yet again.
In the search for sunshine we will lean towards to park, towards the Thames or towards any open space that can accommodate us. It suddenly becomes possible to get a seat in the pubs, but not so easy to get to them, as all the regulars have moved outside and are invariably standing in front of the door.
We hibernate like bears through the winter. We venture out only to perform the most essential of tasks. Anything trivial such as socialising and exercise grinds to a halt until the summer months. Eating however doesn’t grind to a halt, in fact in most cases it increases significantly. The increased food consumption helps us store fat which gives us a little something extra to live on when it gets so dark and cold that you can’t even be bothered to go out and buy food. If you have eaten enough Gregg’s and bar snacks you can delay that overwhelming cold trip to the supermarket as long as your personal supply of blubber lasts.
As I sit here I notice a phenomenon even rarer than the sun itself. The people walking past me have their lips parted and the corners of their mouths are upturned on either side. They appear to be doing something that Londoners rarely do: they are smiling. Some of them are doing it as though they are little uncomfortable with the new placement of their lips. Some look like they may be doing it for the first times in their lives and some look they are practising, but aren’t quite competent enough to go pro yet with it.
A visitor to London in winter could be forgiven for thinking that years of evolution had rid the locals of their teeth. You can go months without seeing a set. The sun changes this. When I left home this morning my next-door neighbour was sitting on her garbage bin reading the Saturday papers in the sun. She looked happier than she had in months, so I didn’t have the heart to tell her that I was awoken last night by a couple of young guys relieving themselves against that the same garbage bin.
The Japanese couple next to me are discussing how friendly they think the locals are. If only they knew what the locals were like the rest of the time. Maybe it didn’t matter, maybe it was just wonderful that this couple will go back to Japan and speak of the friendly English folk in sunny London town. I know how warming it is when people go out of their way to be friendly to you in a new country.
As I am questioning whether I may have been wrong about the humanity in London the couple stand up with their camera in hand. They approach a passing man to take a photograph of them with the gaggle of the ducks that they have been feeding a prawn sandwich from PrĂȘt. The man they approach for help doesn’t so much as stop. He continues walking and shakes his head at them. Under is breath he mutters, ‘fucking tourists.’ Ah, thank god, I was worried that too much ‘Vicar of Dibley’ had thawed the hearts of Londoners. We need a little bit of hatred here; it makes the traffic flow faster.
Labels:
bad TV,
lack of sunshine,
london weather,
tourists,
traffic,
winter spring
Saturday, 14 February 2009
Identity Crisis
Recently whilst sitting in the doctor’s surgery I was asked to complete a customer service survey by the monosyllabic receptionist that the NHS had undoubtedly recruited as some kind of social experiment. The interruption broke my train of thought, I had been preoccupied weighing up the pros and cons of killing the four year old who had just managed to ram a toy truck into my ankle whilst his mother looked on. In the end I decided that it would be more painful for his mother if I kept her son alive.
I agreed to do the survey, knowing that my 4.30pm appointment stood the same chance of actually happening at 4.30pm as the receptionist stood of knowing how to use the pen she handed me. NHS appointments are run with the same efficiency as the London buses. Sadly unlike the buses doctors never come in threes.
Once I had managed to get the pen to work (I assumed yet another social experiment by the NHS) I began ticking boxes with the proficiency of an epileptic civil servant. Often on surveys it is easy to be tempted to bend the truth somewhat. Answering such questions as ‘how old are you?’ or ‘how much do you earn?’ no good can come of you telling the truth. A year off here and an extra zero added there and everyone comes off feeling good. As I was completing this particular survey wearing Ugg boots, odd coloured socks and old sweat pants and looking every one of my 32years, it seemed pointless to lie.
Then there came the question which I would never dream of answering with a lie: ‘how would you describe your ethnicity?’ As ‘bloody foreigner’ didn’t seem to be an option, I scanned the boxes for the best fit. Having been born in Australia of Anglo parents I could have taken pleasure toying with the NHS by ticking ‘Caribbean,’ but the NHS appeared to already have enough problems to cope with. There wasn’t a box for Australian; apparently the survey designer had never been to Earl’s Court. I didn’t want to tick the box ‘other white,’ for two reasons: firstly being the 'other white' made me feel a little too like the other white meat: pork and secondly I didn’t ever want to be grouped into the same box as the Americans. So I ticked the box ‘other’ and scrawled across the line left for further explanation the word ‘Londoner.’
I looked at the paper, realising the significance of what I had done. I had for the first time perhaps most accurately pinpointed the way I saw myself. I was a Londoner. Well, only as ‘floating misfit’ wasn’t an option.’ Maybe that’s what being a Londoner was? I wasn’t even sure if such an ethic group existed. If it did what distinguishes it from other groups?
A Londoner in 2009 is unlikely to have actually been born in London. The fact that so few of them are reliant on surviving a stay in a London hospital ensures the continuation of the race. Those that have been born here will speak with affection about the corner of town that they grew up in, they needn’t tell you where as their accent will tell you that. Perhaps it is more pride that affection. It is a tremendous accomplishment to survive your childhood in a city where more teenage girls carry knives than handbags and where the boys carry sexually transmitted diseases. I looked at the teenager opposite me in the surgery and tried to imagine what he had. He looked like a pin up for Chlamydia.
I wasn’t born here and it remained to be seen whether I survived my first hospital experience. So what made me feel like a Londoner? Sure, I live here, but I have lived in other cities without ever feeling the need to adopt its identity. Was it the fact that every time I saw a moving staircase my body would move to the right unconsciously? Was it that I thought it was unacceptable to have to walk more than thirty metres to get to a beer tap? Or seven metres to a rat? Or two metres to a Starbucks?
Perhaps more interesting was the fact that I would I never be caught dead in an English rugby jersey, yet I would proudly sport a London jersey if such a thing existed. Was I simply a geographical snob? Not much of a snob really to be proud of a town where Z list celebrities have taken on the role and status of Roman Gladiators? These people perform like caged animals while the crowds decide if they should survive or not after each battle. Those that do survive have ‘Celebrity Come Dine with me’ to look forward to. Those that don’t survive have ‘Celebrity Come Dine with me’ to look forward to.
It wasn’t just the people I had to question my affection for but actual the city itself. It had been designed centuries ago by groups of aging men who never expected in their lifetime to physically have to cross the city and so they didn’t allow for that practicality in their planning. Or the need to go to the bathroom during said journey.
So it wasn’t the people. It wasn’t the city. The fact that I was dressed like an Eskimo who had been let lose in a North Face factory sale meant it sure as hell wasn’t the weather. So what made me publicly out myself as a Londoner? I had better work it out as I had ticked the box ‘contact me to discuss further.’ And in a moment of madness I had given my real contact number. This was a rookie mistake, something perhaps that no true Londoner would have done. Where had this sudden outburst of honesty come from? I could feel the convict blood thinning in my veins. In an attempt to reinvigorate my Australianness I handed back the survey but I made sure I slipped their pen into my pocket.
I agreed to do the survey, knowing that my 4.30pm appointment stood the same chance of actually happening at 4.30pm as the receptionist stood of knowing how to use the pen she handed me. NHS appointments are run with the same efficiency as the London buses. Sadly unlike the buses doctors never come in threes.
Once I had managed to get the pen to work (I assumed yet another social experiment by the NHS) I began ticking boxes with the proficiency of an epileptic civil servant. Often on surveys it is easy to be tempted to bend the truth somewhat. Answering such questions as ‘how old are you?’ or ‘how much do you earn?’ no good can come of you telling the truth. A year off here and an extra zero added there and everyone comes off feeling good. As I was completing this particular survey wearing Ugg boots, odd coloured socks and old sweat pants and looking every one of my 32years, it seemed pointless to lie.
Then there came the question which I would never dream of answering with a lie: ‘how would you describe your ethnicity?’ As ‘bloody foreigner’ didn’t seem to be an option, I scanned the boxes for the best fit. Having been born in Australia of Anglo parents I could have taken pleasure toying with the NHS by ticking ‘Caribbean,’ but the NHS appeared to already have enough problems to cope with. There wasn’t a box for Australian; apparently the survey designer had never been to Earl’s Court. I didn’t want to tick the box ‘other white,’ for two reasons: firstly being the 'other white' made me feel a little too like the other white meat: pork and secondly I didn’t ever want to be grouped into the same box as the Americans. So I ticked the box ‘other’ and scrawled across the line left for further explanation the word ‘Londoner.’
I looked at the paper, realising the significance of what I had done. I had for the first time perhaps most accurately pinpointed the way I saw myself. I was a Londoner. Well, only as ‘floating misfit’ wasn’t an option.’ Maybe that’s what being a Londoner was? I wasn’t even sure if such an ethic group existed. If it did what distinguishes it from other groups?
A Londoner in 2009 is unlikely to have actually been born in London. The fact that so few of them are reliant on surviving a stay in a London hospital ensures the continuation of the race. Those that have been born here will speak with affection about the corner of town that they grew up in, they needn’t tell you where as their accent will tell you that. Perhaps it is more pride that affection. It is a tremendous accomplishment to survive your childhood in a city where more teenage girls carry knives than handbags and where the boys carry sexually transmitted diseases. I looked at the teenager opposite me in the surgery and tried to imagine what he had. He looked like a pin up for Chlamydia.
I wasn’t born here and it remained to be seen whether I survived my first hospital experience. So what made me feel like a Londoner? Sure, I live here, but I have lived in other cities without ever feeling the need to adopt its identity. Was it the fact that every time I saw a moving staircase my body would move to the right unconsciously? Was it that I thought it was unacceptable to have to walk more than thirty metres to get to a beer tap? Or seven metres to a rat? Or two metres to a Starbucks?
Perhaps more interesting was the fact that I would I never be caught dead in an English rugby jersey, yet I would proudly sport a London jersey if such a thing existed. Was I simply a geographical snob? Not much of a snob really to be proud of a town where Z list celebrities have taken on the role and status of Roman Gladiators? These people perform like caged animals while the crowds decide if they should survive or not after each battle. Those that do survive have ‘Celebrity Come Dine with me’ to look forward to. Those that don’t survive have ‘Celebrity Come Dine with me’ to look forward to.
It wasn’t just the people I had to question my affection for but actual the city itself. It had been designed centuries ago by groups of aging men who never expected in their lifetime to physically have to cross the city and so they didn’t allow for that practicality in their planning. Or the need to go to the bathroom during said journey.
So it wasn’t the people. It wasn’t the city. The fact that I was dressed like an Eskimo who had been let lose in a North Face factory sale meant it sure as hell wasn’t the weather. So what made me publicly out myself as a Londoner? I had better work it out as I had ticked the box ‘contact me to discuss further.’ And in a moment of madness I had given my real contact number. This was a rookie mistake, something perhaps that no true Londoner would have done. Where had this sudden outburst of honesty come from? I could feel the convict blood thinning in my veins. In an attempt to reinvigorate my Australianness I handed back the survey but I made sure I slipped their pen into my pocket.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
